Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
Keywords: journal rankings, quality, publication anxiety, survey
AbstractJournal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but there have been few empirical studies on the possible effects. To address this gap, we surveyed Information Systems (IS) academics who published in one of three key IS conferences in 2013, to gather their views of the effects of journal ranking systems. Overall, we found that the concerns in the literature were strongly reflected in the views of those surveyed. Academics believe the system has greatly increased their publication anxiety. While most believed that the quality of published research had improved, researchers believe the ranking systems inhibit innovative, risky research, and encourages safe, conforming, mainstream research.
How to Cite
Coulthard, D., & Keller, S. (2016). Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 20. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v20i0.1262
Copyright (c) 2016 Darryl Coulthard, Susan Keller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
AJIS publishes open-access articles distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Non-Commercial and Attribution License which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and AJIS are credited. All other rights including granting permissions beyond those in the above license remain the property of the author(s).