Improving IT project governance: A reflective analysis based on critical systems heuristics
Keywords: IT project governance, paradigms, critical systems heuristics, boundary critique
AbstractIT project governance involves establishing authority structures, policies and mechanisms for IT projects. However, the way governance arrangements are implemented can sometimes exclude or marginalise important stakeholders. In this paper, we use critical systems thinking, and the notions of boundary critique and entrenched structural conflict, to inform a critical re-analysis of a case study where the governance proved relatively ineffective. We use the ‘twelve questions’ from the critical systems heuristics (CSH) approach to diagnose problems with governance arrangements and suggest solutions. Based on this, we suggest the CSH approach has theoretical and practical efficacy for improving IT project governance in general.
How to Cite
Johnstone, D., & Tate, M. (2017). Improving IT project governance: A reflective analysis based on critical systems heuristics. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1227
Copyright (c) 2017 David Johnstone, Mary Tate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
AJIS publishes open-access articles distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Non-Commercial and Attribution License which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and AJIS are credited. All other rights including granting permissions beyond those in the above license remain the property of the author(s).